An Epidemic Model of Estimating Metro Station Vulnerabilities Towards Delay Propagation

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

Laetitia Molkenboer (Student TU Delft)

F. Schulte (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Y. Zhu (TU Delft - Transport, Mobility and Logistics)

O. Cats (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/MT-ITS68460.2025.11223584
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
ISBN (electronic)
9798331580636
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Metro networks face operational challenges due to increasing ridership and system growth, particularly in managing delay propagation. Epidemiology models have recently been an interesting method in transportation research for studying delays. This study, therefore, aims to investigate if the Susceptible-infectious-susceptible (SIS) model is suitable to help model delay propagation in a metro network through its ability to reproduce the vulnerability of metro stations for specific instances. Using data from the Washington Metro Network, two groups of delay propagation instances were selected and used for model training and testing using a differential evolution algorithm. The results indicate that the vulnerability values as calculated from the reallife data do not follow the expected trend. Still, our model can capture this variation with good vulnerability estimation accuracy for both groups. Also, the predicted vulnerability values for the first group are more accurate than for the second group. However, limitations such as underestimation and overestimation of station vulnerabilities, and sensitivity to training data were observed. These challenges stemmed from the dynamics between specific parameters and the lack of additional factors.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 11-05-2026