Societal values, tensions and uncertainties in resource recovery from wastewaters

Review (2022)
Author(s)

Mar Parada (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

P.A. Kehrein (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Dimitros Xevgenos (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

L. Asveld (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Patricia Osseweijer (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Copyright
© 2022 M.D.M. Palmeros Parada, P.A. Kehrein, Dimitris Xevgenos, L. Asveld, P. Osseweijer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115759
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 M.D.M. Palmeros Parada, P.A. Kehrein, Dimitris Xevgenos, L. Asveld, P. Osseweijer
Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Volume number
319
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The recovery of resources, including water reuse, has been presented as a solution to overcome scarcity, and improve the economic and environmental performance of water provision and treatment. However, its implementation faces non-technical challenges, including the need to collaborate with new stakeholders and face societal acceptance issues. Looking at the prominence of the circular economy in current policy developments and the challenges to resource recovery, exploring these issues is urgently needed. In this work, we reviewed a broad range of literature to identify societal values relevant to the recovery of water and other resources from wastewaters, particularly urban and industrial wastewater and desalination brines. We discuss tensions and uncertainties around these values, such as the tension between socio-economic expectations of resource recovery and potential long-term sustainability impacts, as well as uncertainties regarding safety and regulations. For addressing these tensions and uncertainties, we suggest aligning common methods in engineering and the natural sciences with Responsible Innovation approaches, such as Value Sensitive Design and Safe-by-Design. To complement Responsible Innovation, social learning with a Sustainability Transitions or Adaptive Governance perspective is suggested.