Flow analysis of hammerhead launcher geometries in the transonic regime

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

A. D'Aguanno (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

A. González Romero (Student TU Delft)

F.F.J. Schrijer (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

B.W. van Oudheusden (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-2145 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Article number
AIAA 2024-2145
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-62410-711-5
Event
AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum (2024-01-08 - 2024-01-12), Orlando, United States
Downloads counter
351
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Hammerhead launcher configurations, characterized by a larger diameter in the payload fairing than the rest of the launch vehicle, face substantial challenges during transonic operations due to their susceptibility to flow separation and intense pressure fluctuations. This experimental study investigates the influence of the nose and boat-tail geometry on the flow around hammerhead configurations in the transonic regime (Ma=0.7-0.8) and for various angles of attack (α=0-4°). To gain a general understanding of the main flow features, such as shockwave formation, separated flow in the boat tail region, and flow reattachment, oil flow and schlieren visualizations were employed. Schlieren visualizations were also utilized to characterize the level of unsteadiness in these regions. Additionally, particle image velocimetry was employed to quantify variations in the velocity field. The study's findings reveal an optimization of flow performance in the presence of a bi-conic nose, attributed to the creation of two-shockwave structures with relatively low intensity. This is in contrast to the ogive and conic noses, which exhibit a single, more detrimental shockwave structure (with the conic nose being the least favorable configuration). The investigation into different boat tail angles indicates that adopting low-angle boat tails (5° and 15° compared to 34°) leads to a noticeable reduction in the separated area, albeit associated with an increase in the range of oscillation of the shockwave structures.

Files

License info not available