Differences and similarities in perceptions of interactions with Artificial Social Agents between German and English speakers

Bachelor Thesis (2023)
Author(s)

B.A. Khodakov (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Willem-Paul Brinkman – Mentor (TU Delft - Interactive Intelligence)

Nele Albers – Mentor (TU Delft - Interactive Intelligence)

Odette Scharenborg – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2023 Bolek Khodakov
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Bolek Khodakov
Graduation Date
27-06-2023
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Humans interact with various Artificial Social Agents (ASAs) on a daily basis. ASAs range from the Honda robot ASIMO to Apple’s Siri. To measure the perception of human-ASA interactions, a standardized questionnaire was created. Yet, this questionnaire was so far only available in English and Chinese. It has been found that culture can affect how these interactions are perceived. The aim of this study is to answer the question: What are the differences and similarities of the English and German human-ASA interaction interpretations? In this paper, we translate the questionnaire into German, validate it. Once proven valid, we give the English and German questionnaire on bilingual participants who watch a human-ASA interaction video and rate it in both languages. We measure the differences and similarities between the English and German responses. At the end, we combine the finding from the questionnaire results with examples from literature to form recommendations for future ASA developments. We conclude that an average good level of correlation between the two languages for the 90 questionnaire items (ICC M = 0.65, SD = 0.14, range [0.27, 0.90]), on the construct level (ICC M = 0.8, SD = 0.1, range [0.51, 0.92]), and for the 24 representative items (M = 0.67, SD = 0.14, range[0.31, 0.90]). Additionally, we found systematic differences between the English questionnaire scores of the bilingual sample seen in this study and a previously established mixed-English sample.

Files

Paper_Khodakov.pdf
(pdf | 0.192 Mb)
License info not available