Design and Evaluation of Vertical Situation Display Reflecting Aircraft Configuration Changes

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Alexander F. van Geel (Student TU Delft)

Clark Borst (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

M. M.(René) van Paassen (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Max Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I011248
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Issue number
6
Volume number
22
Pages (from-to)
412-424
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Energy management is essential in low-energy flight conditions. Changes in fixed-wing aircraft configuration affect performance and energy boundaries, and improved insight therein should allow pilots to better predict potentially dangerous situations, maintain suitable safety margins, and more effectively react to unforeseen events. This paper presents the design and experimental evaluation of a vertical situation display with enhancements portraying changes in the flight performance envelope. Sixteen pilots were tasked to fly approach and go-around scenarios with both a baseline and an enhanced display, with some of the scenarios including unexpected failures in configuration changes. Results show that the new display makes pilots maintain larger margins in velocity, thus spending less time below the advised minimum speed limit in final approach. However, these larger velocity margins also led to larger errors with respect to target velocities. Failures in configuration changes were more quickly discovered with the new display, although these results could not be substantiated due to a lack of statistical significance. However, pilots did report feeling better able to predict dangerous situations. Overall, pilots preferred the novel display; no significant differences in workload were found.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 25-09-2025