Grinding – good or bad for reduction of rolling contact fatigue– observations from in-service rails with white etching layer

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Tim Vernaillen (Infrabel, TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Pan Zhang (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Stefan Lundström Sveder (Trafikverket)

Alfredo Núñez (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Rolf Dollevoet (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Zili Li (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Research Group
Railway Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2026.109620
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Railway Engineering
Volume number
209
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Rail grinding has been widely applied in railway networks worldwide to remove or prevent rolling contact fatigue (RCF) cracks. However, some concerns have arisen regarding grinding, that it may introduce initial damage to the rail and largely shorten the RCF life. This work aims to better understand the effect of grinding on the long-term degradation of in-service rails, particularly concerning White Etching Layer (WEL) and RCF cracks. Seven rail samples were selected and taken from the Belgian and Swedish railway networks, with different grinding histories, accumulated loads, and steel grades. The mechanical and microstructural properties of these samples were examined through the hardness test and optical microscopy. WEL and microcracks were observed in both ground and non-ground rails, suggesting that rail grinding does not create additional defects nor negatively impact the rail surface after long-term service. Macrocracks were observed only in rail samples that had undergone zero or a single grinding cycle, confirming the beneficial role of rail grinding in mitigating RCF cracks. Ratcheting is the dominant crack initiation mechanism under the examined conditions, while WEL may also contribute to crack formation, given that macrocracks predominantly occur at the transition between the WEL and the pearlite.