Automatic Detection of Mind Wandering Based on Eye Movement from the Mementos Data Set

Bachelor Thesis (2022)
Author(s)

M. van Dijk (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Xucong Zhang – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

B. Dudzik – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

HS Hung – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

P.K. Murukannaiah – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Interactive Intelligence)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2022 Max van Dijk
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Max van Dijk
Graduation Date
22-06-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['CSE3000 Research Project']
Programme
['Computer Science and Engineering']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Mind wandering is a phenomenon that is used to describe moments where a person's attention appears to shift away to something that is not related to the primary task, which can have a negative influence on the task performance. In this research, the aim is to create a viable algorithm that can automatically detect mind wandering based on eye movement from the Mementos data set. A method to automatically detect mind wandering could be used in online education in order to help students study more effectively, for example. The Mementos data set contains, unlike previous research, videos captured in an uncontrolled environment using inexpensive equipment. Features based on fixations and saccades were used to create two algorithms which were able to perform better than chance, having an average AOC-ROC of 0.63 and 0.59, as well as having an average F1 score of 0.046 and 0.041 compared to the chance-based model with an F1 score of 0.029.

Files

License info not available