Improving the accuracy of computing chemical potentials in CFCMC simulations

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

A. Rahbari (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

R. Hens (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

David Dubbeldam (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Thijs JH J. H. Vlugt (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

Research Group
Engineering Thermodynamics
Copyright
© 2019 A. Rahbari, R. Hens, D. Dubbeldam, T.J.H. Vlugt
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1631497
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 A. Rahbari, R. Hens, D. Dubbeldam, T.J.H. Vlugt
Research Group
Engineering Thermodynamics
Issue number
23-24
Volume number
117
Pages (from-to)
3493-3508
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The CFCMC simulation methodology considers an expanded ensemble to solve the problem of low insertion/deletion acceptance probabilities in open ensembles. It allows for a direct calculation of the chemical potential by binning of the coupling parameter λ and using the probabilities p(λ = 0) and p(λ = 1), which require extrapolation. Here, we show that this extrapolation leads to systematic errors when the distribution p(λ) is steep. We propose an alternative binning scheme which improves the accuracy of computed chemical potentials. We also investigate the use of multiple fractional molecules needed in simulations of multiple components, and show that these fractional molecules are very weakly correlated and that calculations of chemical potentials are not affected. The statistics of Boltzmann averages in systems with multiple fractional molecules is shown to be poor. Good agreement is found between CFCMC averages (uncorrected for the bias) and Boltzmann averages when the number of fractional molecules is less than 1% of the total number of all molecules. We found that, in dense systems, biased averages have a smaller uncertainty compared to Boltzmann averages.