Retrieving pulsatility in ultrasound localization microscopy

Master Thesis (2022)
Author(s)

M.S.J. Wiersma (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Contributor(s)

B.G. Heiles – Mentor (TU Delft - ImPhys/Medical Imaging)

D. Kalisvaart – Mentor (TU Delft - Team Carlas Smith)

D. Maresca – Mentor (TU Delft - ImPhys/Medical Imaging)

Carlas Smith – Mentor (TU Delft - Team Carlas Smith)

R Van de Plas – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Team Raf Van de Plas)

G.J. Verbiest – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Dynamics of Micro and Nano Systems)

Faculty
Mechanical Engineering
Copyright
© 2022 Myrthe Wiersma
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Myrthe Wiersma
Graduation Date
20-05-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Mechanical Engineering | Systems and Control']
Faculty
Mechanical Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) is a super-resolved vascular imaging method that provides a 10-fold improvement in resolution compared to ultrafast ultrasound Doppler imaging. Because typical ULM acquisitions accumulate large numbers of synthetic microbubble (MB) tracks over hundreds of cardiac cycles, transient hemodynamic variations such as pulsatility get averaged out. Here we introduce two independent processing methods to retrieve pulsatile flow information from MB tracks sampled at kilohertz framerates and demonstrate their potential on a simulated dataset. Our first approach filters out ULM localization grid artifacts and successfully recovers the pulsatility fraction Pf with a root mean square error of 3.3%. Our second approach relies on the derivation of the velocity distribution of MBs as observed from a stationary observer. We show that pulsatile flow gives rise to a bimodal velocity distribution with peaks indicating the maximum and minimum velocity of the cardiac cycle. Measuring the locations of these peaks, we successfully estimated Pf with an error of 5.2%. Last, we evaluated the impact of the MB localization precision σ on our ability to retrieve the bimodal signature of a pulsatile flow. Together, our results demonstrate that pulsatility can be retrieved from high framerate ULM acquisitions and that the estimation of the pulsatility fraction improves with MB localization precision.

Files

License info not available