A Novel Automated Electronic Checklist for Non-Normal Event Resolution Tasks

Conference Paper (2021)
Author(s)

C.E. Linskens (Student TU Delft)

J.P. Reitsma (Control & Simulation)

C. Borst (Control & Simulation)

M.M. van Paassen (Control & Simulation)

Max Mulder (Control & Simulation)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1320 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Article number
AIAA 2021-1320
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-62410-609-5
Event
AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (2021-01-11 - 2021-01-21), Virtual/online event due to COVID-19 , Virtual, Online
Page Views
422
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Non-normal event resolution in-flight can be challenging on the flight crew with increased time pressure, workload, stress. Other competing tasks impose a risk on flight safety and burdens the decision-making process. Pilots rely on checklists to aid in their effort, which in its state-of-the-art form are presented on the dedicated Electronic Checklist (ECL) display for Boeing aircraft and on the Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) system for Airbus aircraft. However, human-induced errors and limitations remain prevalent. Exploring a different approach from other research efforts, this paper proposes a novel design which assumes automated checklist handling as a viable option to reduce workload durning nonnormal events. In a human-in-the-loop experiment with 12 commercial pilots, the design was compared against a reproduced Boeing 787 ECL over two scenarios. A synthetic setup was used, assuming a touch-based Boeing 737-8 flight deck combined with the Boeing 787 state-of-the-art alerting systems and displays. Results indicate significant checklist completion time reductions with the proposed design of 31.3% and 42.0% for an electrical and hydraulic failure, respectively. Experienced workload and situation awareness remained unchanged, though compressed in a shorter time frame. The novel display was positively anticipated by participants but was found to lack automation feedback.

Files

6.2021_1320_1.pdf
(pdf | 0.704 Mb)
License info not available