Building the Bridge: How System Dynamics Models Operationalise Energy Transitions and Contribute towards Creating an Energy Policy Toolbox

Journal Article (2024)
Authors

Sarah Hafner (Zurich University of Applied Science (ZHAW))

Lawrence Gottschamer

M.D. Kubli (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

Roberto Pasqualino (University of Cambridge)

Silvia Ulli-Beer (Zurich University of Applied Science (ZHAW))

Research Group
Policy Analysis
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198326
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Issue number
19
Volume number
16
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198326
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The complexity and multi-dimensionality of energy transitions are broadly recognised, and insights from transition research increasingly support policy decision making. Sustainability transition scholars have been developing mostly qualitative socio-technical transition (STT) frameworks, and modelling has been argued to be complementary to these frameworks, for example for policy testing. We systematically evaluate five system dynamics (SD) energy models on their representation of key STT characteristics. Our results demonstrate that (i) the evaluated models incorporate most of the core characteristics of STT, and (ii) the policies tested in the models address different levels and aspects of the multi-level perspective (MLP) framework. In light of the increasing emergence of energy (transition) models, we recommend to systematically map models and their tested policy interventions into the MLP framework or other sustainability transition frameworks, creating an overview of tested policies (a “policy navigator”). This navigator supports policy makers and modellers alike, facilitating them to find previously tested policy options and related models for particular policy objectives.