Transformation of Urban Communities from Within

Residents’ Role in Lilong’s Attributive Switch Between Market-led Commodity and State-controlled Property

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

Kaiyi Zhu (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Carola Hein (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2018.1.2711 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Pages (from-to)
588-597
Event
IPHS 2018: 18th International Planning History Society Conference (2018-07-15 - 2018-07-19), Yokohama, Japan
Downloads counter
179
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The state has owned most historical buildings since the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Residents within are entitled to the right to use the house in the form of a lease. After entering a free trade housing market in 1988, residents in historic neighbourhoods of Shanghai have been suffering uncertainty of their identities. Residents’ role, responsibilities and obligations within urban transformation, has always been in suspense and strongly affected by multiple stakeholders’ decisions. Based on an analysis of the relationship between the native residents and the historic Lilong communities they are living in, this paper examines stakeholders’ heritage approaches in three typical transforming project, to explore residents’ mobility and behaviour within varied urban transformation and socio-economic development. Through a literature review, fieldwork and a pilot study in Xintiandi, Tianzifang and Chunyangli districts, urban transformation in historic urban communities from within is found literally rare in China. This paper argues that residents could not clarify their role by living in urban heritage, neither obtaining house-ownership to define their position nor being treated as one component of urban heritage. Government in China has been indeed the character who mediates between all stakeholders and bears the most burden.