Heritage Policy based Rehabilitation Scenarios

Limits of Acceptable Change of Heritage Housing in São Luís, Faro

Master Thesis (2023)
Author(s)

J.M. Romeijnders (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

Ana Pereira Roders – Mentor (TU Delft - Heritage & Architecture)

WJ Quist – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Heritage & Architecture)

B. Andrade – Coach (TU Delft - Heritage & Architecture)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright
© 2023 Jeanique Romeijnders
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Jeanique Romeijnders
Coordinates
37.02196838195552, -7.927059759949603
Graduation Date
28-06-2023
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences | Heritage & Architecture']
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Thisgraduation project that explores the boundaries of acceptable policy change through three redesign scenarios. Its objective is to create and evaluate values-based models for the transformation of built heritage. The MSc3 Graduation Studio: Revitalising Heritage comprises three key phases: a survey to assess cultural significance, a values-driven redesign process, and a heritage impact assessment. Initially, existing policies were examined, followed by a gamified survey comparing the perspectives of two distinct target groups: the community and experts. The design proposal presents three options, ranging from conservative to substantial alterations, for heritage housing. To assess the effectiveness of the methodology, a SWOT analysis was conducted to analyze the project's impact. Overall, this graduation project aims to provide insights into the potential for change in heritage redesign while considering the cultural significance and stakeholder perspectives.

Files

2._Research_FINAL.pdf
(pdf | 3.91 Mb)
License info not available
P5.pdf
(pdf | 19.7 Mb)
License info not available
License info not available
Posters_draft_2.pdf
(pdf | 8.06 Mb)
License info not available
3._Design_Final.pdf
(pdf | 3.14 Mb)
License info not available
3._Reflection_Final.pdf
(pdf | 0.141 Mb)
License info not available
Graduation_Plan_1.pdf
(pdf | 0.387 Mb)
License info not available