Incorporating Spatial Variability into FEM Analyses of Anchored Retaining Walls

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

Na Hao (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Cormac Reale (University of Bath)

Kevin Duffy (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Ken Gavin (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Research Group
Geo-engineering
URL related publication
https://rpsonline.com.sg/proceedings/isgsr2025/html/P144.html Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Geo-engineering
Article number
P144
Pages (from-to)
937-940
Publisher
Research Publishing
ISBN (electronic)
978-981-94-4075-7
Event
9th International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk (2025-08-25 - 2025-08-28), Oslo, Norway
Downloads counter
18
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In a finite element-based reliability analysis, distributions of geotechnical input parameters from soil properties measured at the site may overlook spatial variability, especially across sparsely investigated areas. In doing so, soil parameters from weak zones are often considered as representative values across entire soil layers, potentially leading to overly conservative safety assessments. This issue becomes critical when analysing geotechnical failures in anchors, where their tensile resistance relies heavily on the averaged soil properties along the anchors. To address these challenges, this paper presents a method that incorporates spatial averaging into a reliability analysis. To demonstrate its application, a quay wall at the Port of Rotterdam is presented where the parameter distributions and their spatial variability were derived from the Cone Penetration Test (CPT). Comparing the reliability index before and after the inclusion of spatial variability shows that ignoring spatial variability may be overly conservative when assessing shaft capacity of piles or anchors.