Multiple co-existing ontologies in the paraná delta
An action-research approach to the case of the Paraná Delta, Argentina
O.M.S. Schölvinck (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
MW Ertsen – Mentor (TU Delft - Water Resources)
M Hrachowitz – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Water Resources)
M Kok – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)
J. Kwakkel – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)
Alex Curran – Coach (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)
Judith ter Maat – Graduation committee member
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Adaptive delta management (ADM) deals with making flexible and robust plans in the uncertain environment of deltas. ADM receives increasing attention to be applied globally, including in Argentina. In this research, I have studied how modelling can assist ADM in Argentina through action research by applying various participatory methods like workshops, group model building and interviews. In the exploratory phase, I could make several observations regarding the application of ADM in Argentina. I discovered something unexpected: Multiple co-existing ontologies of the Paraná Delta were shaped in practice, influencing the ADM process. The Paraná Delta seemed to be continually changing per actor, time and space in the Delta. In order to introduce the reader to this multiplicity, I offer an approach to formulate these ontologies and provide several examples of ontologies in the Delta. Next, I propose a structured approach to connect ontologies to modelling. The added value of using ontologies for the modelling of the Paraná Delta was discussed with experts. The results indicate that by connecting ontologies and modelling, the ADM process (in the Paraná Delta) will be strengthened, since ontologies (1) illustrate modellers assumptions, (2) improve stakeholders and politicians understanding of the Delta, (3) guide research and data collection to verify assumptions on the Delta, and (4) strengthen the understanding of one's own ontology. Therefore, the results show that incorporating ontologies in ADM research is a valuable approach. Future research should focus on formulating models to support the claims made in this article. Further, a theoretical investigation is needed to incorporate the use of ontologies in the ADM process. In order to guide future researchers to incorporate ontologies in their modelling, a framework is constructed based on my research experience: ‘the Kite framework’.