Co-creation, control or compliance? How Dutch community engagement professionals view their work

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

E.M.H.R. van de Grift (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

E.H.W.J. Cuppen (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Shannon Spruit (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2020 E.M.H.R. van de Grift, E.H.W.J. Cuppen, S. Spruit
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101323
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 E.M.H.R. van de Grift, E.H.W.J. Cuppen, S. Spruit
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Issue number
February 2020
Volume number
60
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Most literature on community engagement (CE) focuses on why and how local communities respond to energy projects or technologies. There has been very limited attention to project developers and the way they shape CE in the literature. We address this gap by focusing on the work of professionals active within or for energy companies, who are responsible for engaging communities in the development of energy projects: so-called ‘community engagement professionals’ (CEPs). Using Q methodology, we explore how CEPs see their role as front-line workers operating on the boundary between their own organization and the local community.

Our analysis results in three perspectives of their own work amongst CEPs. Perspective 1 views CE as co-creation and their position as one of an intermediary between their organization and the community. Perspective 2 sees CE as an inherent part of project management, using it to remain in control of the process. Perspective 3 is all about project development, with CE as something that must be done as part of compliance with laws and regulations.

We show that CEPs have heterogeneous perspectives on community engagement. We discuss differences between these perspectives: 1) mode of engagement; 2) the position of the CEP between their organization and the community; 3) how conflict is viewed and dealt with; 4) the extent to which CEPs see themselves as responsible for the representation of communities; and 5) interaction with internal stakeholders. We end by discussing the implications of this study for project developers and the governance of energy infrastructures.