Energy management for hybrid and fully electric vessels via a multi-objective Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

C. Löffler (TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations)

Rinze Geertsma (Netherlands Defence Academy, TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations)

H Polinder (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

A. Coraddu (TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations)

Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120150
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
Volume number
343
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A key factor towards zero-emission shipping is the adoption of electric propulsion with hybrid power sources. The heterogeneous power sources of modern electric vessels require optimal energy management systems, as conventional rule-based control in hybrid energy systems may result in suboptimal solutions with limited flexibility. Advanced optimal control strategies offer a promising avenue to address this issue. This paper presents a novel control strategy based on the Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for a dual-fuel full-electric vessel operating with diesel engines and hydrogen fuel cells taking into account both fuel cost and NOx emissions. The effectiveness of the developed controllers is evaluated against a benchmark derived from state-of-the-art strategies in a simulation study using real-world data. The results highlight the controller's performance, as well as the operator's choice by selection of weights for the objectives. The proposed control strategy achieves nearly 2 % fuel savings compared to a single-objective rule-based controller. It also exploits the potential for up to 45 % reductions in NOx emissions. When both objectives are combined, the controller still delivers over 0.5 % fuel savings while reducing NOx emissions by nearly 15 %. If a financial cost is assigned to emissions, the total operational cost savings increase to more than 4 %.