A review of alkaline electrolyzer technology modeling and applications for decision-making optimization in energy systems
C. Huang (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)
Jose Luis Rueda-Torres (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)
Yi Zong (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))
Shi You (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))
Xin Jin (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Power-to-hydrogen systems, particularly the most mature alkaline electrolyzers (AELs), are increasingly deployed in modern energy systems due to their pivotal role in green hydrogen production and decarbonization. Proper modeling is vital for optimizing AEL lifecycle decisions, including design, operation, and investment. Despite numerous proposed models, a review focusing on their applications in system-level decision-making (e.g., operation and planning) remains lacking. This paper bridges this gap by reviewing over 100 peer-reviewed articles to offer an in-depth overview of AEL models employed in system-level decision-making. Followed by clarifying modeling requirements across different levels of AEL system analysis, three types of AEL models are classified in system-level decision-making: linear electricity–hydrogen (LEHM), nonlinear electricity–hydrogen (NEHM), and integrated electricity-heat-hydrogen models (IEHHM). This classification is based on representing the AEL with different levels of multi-physics detail and energy conversion assumptions. LEHM assumes a constant electricity-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of typically about 60%–70%, while NEHM and IEHHM allow modeling of dynamic efficiency variations in the typical range of 60%–80%, where the IEHHM uniquely integrates thermal dynamics. Their modeling principles, characteristics, strengths, and limitations are systematically reviewed, followed by an in-depth overview of their applications and impacts across four applications: economic operation, grid services, heat recovery, and capacity planning. It reveals that LEHM, NEHM, and IEHHM are employed in 35%, 42%, and 23% of these applications, respectively. Finally, a discussion of current modeling limitations and future direction is provided. This paper offers valuable insights and guidance for selecting appropriate AEL models in decision-making studies and identifying pathways for advancing AEL modeling.
help_outline