Implementing Fair Streets for school zones in the Netherlands

Evaluating stakeholder perspectives to achieve a "Fair Street" design for a school street in Delft: A multi-criteria decision approach

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

E.M. van Veen (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

JA Annema – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

H. Farah – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Sander Buningh – Graduation committee member (BAM Infraconsult)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
12-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics']
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In response to the automobile-oriented urban street designs, this study explores the implementation of "Fair Streets" in school zones in the Netherlands. This research aims to create a transition from only vehicle prioritization to also a focus on social, environmental, and community functions on streets around school zones. Currently, up to 50% of public space in cities is allocated to car infrastructure, leading to significant social and environmental drawbacks. This research uses a multi-criteria decision-making method, applying the Best-Worst Method (BWM) for interviews and surveys amongst key stakeholders at the Fuutlaan in Delft to evaluate stakeholder perspectives and integrate various needs into renewed street designs. The interviews reveal a strong preference for a more sustainable design, emphasizing the need for resistance to rainfall and heat, which aligns with the municipality's redevelopment goals. Also, designs that reduce car parking space in favor of inclusivity and traffic safety are desired, reflecting a shift towards a more fair use of street space. However, the acceptance of this redevelopment among some car users remains low, causing resistance. Therefore, this study advocates for policy adaptations that increase the feasibility and acceptance of such transformative urban designs. Recommendations for practice include involving the stakeholders early in the planning process and keeping them well-informed and educated about changes in the neighborhood. Also, creating trials with space usage changes and providing sufficient transportation alternatives are recommended. For further research, it is important to focus mainly on this topic's social aspect. To increase acceptance and participation, methods are needed to approach and convince people to support a fairer street.

Files

License info not available