Landslide precipitation thresholds in Rwanda

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

J. Uwihirwe (TU Delft - Water Resources, University of Rwanda)

Markus Hrachowitz (TU Delft - Water Resources)

T.A. Bogaard (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Research Group
Water Resources
Copyright
© 2020 J. Uwihirwe, M. Hrachowitz, T.A. Bogaard
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01457-9
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 J. Uwihirwe, M. Hrachowitz, T.A. Bogaard
Research Group
Water Resources
Issue number
10
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
2469-2481
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Regional empirical-statistical thresholds indicating the precipitation conditions initiating landslides are of crucial importance for landslide early warning system development. The objectives of this research were to use landslide and precipitation data in an empirical-statistical approach to (1) identify precipitation-related variables with the highest explanatory power for landslide occurrence and (2) define both trigger and trigger-cause based thresholds for landslides in Rwanda, Central-East Africa. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) metrics were used to test the suitability of a suite of precipitation-related explanatory variables. A Bayesian probabilistic approach, maximum true skill statistics and the minimum radial distance were used to determine the most informative threshold levels above which landslide are high likely to occur. The results indicated that the event precipitation volumes E, cumulative 1-day rainfall (RD1) that coincide with the day of landslide occurrence and 10-day antecedent precipitation are variables with the highest discriminatory power to distinguish landslide from no landslide conditions. The highest landslide prediction capability in terms of true positive alarms was obtained from single rainfall variables based on trigger-based thresholds. However, that predictive capability was constrained by the high rate of false positive alarms and thus the elevated probability to neglect the contribution of additional causal factors that lead to the occurrence of landslides and which can partly be accounted for by the antecedent precipitation indices. Further combination of different variables into trigger-cause pairs and the use of suitable thresholds in bilinear format improved the prediction capacity of the real trigger-based thresholds.