Prepared for the Unknown

Adapting AIOps Capacity Forecasting Models to Data Changes

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

L. Poenaru-Olaru (TU Delft - Software Engineering)

Wouter Van't Hof (ING Analytics)

Adrian Stańdo (ING Hubs Poland)

Arkadiusz P. Trawiński (ING Hubs Poland)

E. Kapel (ING Analytics, TU Delft - Software Engineering)

Jan S. Rellermeyer (TU Delft - Data-Intensive Systems, Leibniz Universität)

Luis Cruz (TU Delft - Software Engineering)

A. van Deursen (TU Delft - Software Engineering)

Research Group
Software Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE66568.2025.00047
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Software Engineering
Pages (from-to)
394-405
ISBN (electronic)
9798350393026
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Capacity management is critical for software organizations to allocate resources effectively and meet operational demands. An important step in capacity management is predicting future resource needs often relies on data-driven analytics and machine learning (ML) forecasting models, which require frequent retraining to stay relevant as data evolves. Continuously retraining the forecasting models can be expensive and difficult to scale, posing a challenge for engineering teams tasked with balancing accuracy and efficiency. Retraining only when the data changes appears to be a more computationally efficient alternative, but its impact on accuracy requires further investigation. In this work, we investigate the effects of retraining capacity forecasting models for time series based on detected changes in the data compared to periodic retraining. Our results show that drift-based retraining achieves comparable forecasting accuracy to periodic retraining in most cases, making it a costeffective strategy. However, in cases where data is changing rapidly, periodic retraining is still preferred to maximize the forecasting accuracy. These findings offer actionable insights for software teams to enhance forecasting systems, reducing retraining overhead while maintaining robust performance.

Files

Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 15-05-2026