Planning policies for the driverless city using backcasting and the participatory Q-Methodology

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Soledad Nogués (University of Cantabria)

Esther González-González (University of Cantabria)

D. Stead (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy, Aalto University)

Rubén Cordera (University of Cantabria)

Research Group
Spatial Planning and Strategy
Copyright
© 2023 Soledad Nogués, Esther González-González, D. Stead, Rubén Cordera
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104535
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Soledad Nogués, Esther González-González, D. Stead, Rubén Cordera
Research Group
Spatial Planning and Strategy
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
142
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can potentially bring about major changes in cities. Anticipatory planning approaches may provide valuable opportunities for fostering desirable transitions and pre-empting undesirable impacts. This research employs a combination of two methods to define the key policies to support a transition to the desirable driverless urban futures: the backcasting approach and the participatory Q-method. The combination of these techniques aims to identify different viewpoints about policies with the purpose of determining more effective and more acceptable options. The article analyses viewpoints from 20 citizens and 10 experts. The results point to the existence of two main viewpoints about the most and least desirable policies. The first viewpoint centres around increasing pedestrian mobility and promoting a more compact city. The second viewpoint centres around expanding transit-oriented development (TOD) and new networks of green spaces. Meanwhile, support for regulation-oriented policies to discourage the use of private motorised vehicles was relatively low. This research not only sheds light on the different viewpoints on the policies to achieve more desirable urban visions, it also illustrates the tensions and disagreements that may arise in the process of policy-making.

Files

1_s2.0_S0264275123003475_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.882 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 26-02-2024
License info not available