Spatial analysis of new testament textual emendations utilizing confusion distances

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Vincent Van Altena (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Jan Krans (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Henk Bakker (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Balázs Dukai (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Jantien Stoter (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
Urban Data Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0004 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Urban Data Science
Issue number
1
Volume number
5
Pages (from-to)
44-65
Downloads counter
288
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.