Simulation of vertical core-annular flow with a turbulent annulus

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

H. Li (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

MJBM Pourquié (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

G Ooms (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

RAWM Henkes (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
Copyright
© 2023 H. Li, M.J.B.M. Pourquie, G. Ooms, R.A.W.M. Henkes
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104551
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 H. Li, M.J.B.M. Pourquie, G. Ooms, R.A.W.M. Henkes
Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
Volume number
167
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) with the Launder & Sharma low-Reynolds number k−ε model was used to simulate core-annular flow in the same configuration with vertical upflow as considered by Kim & Choi (2018), who carried out Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS), and by Vanegas Prada (1999), who performed experiments. The DNS are numerically very accurate and can thus be used for benchmarking of the RANS turbulence model. There is a large ratio between the oil and water viscosities, and the density difference between the water and oil is only small. The frictional pressure drop was fixed and the water holdup fraction was varied. Differences between the RANS and DNS predictions, e.g. in the wave structure and in the Reynolds stresses, are discussed. Despite the shortcomings of the considered Launder & Sharma low-Reynolds number k−ε model in RANS, in comparison to DNS, the RANS approach properly describes the main flow structures for upward moving core-annular flow in a vertical pipe, like the travelling interfacial waves in combination with a turbulent water annulus. The Fanning friction factor with RANS is 18% lower than with DNS, and the holdup ratio with RANS is only slightly higher than with DNS (i.e. it has a slightly larger tendency to accumulate water in RANS than in DNS).