GeoBIM Benchmark 2019

Intermediate Results

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

F. Noardo (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

F. Biljecki (National University of Singapore)

G. Agugiaro (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

K. A. Arroyo Ohori (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

Claire Ellul (University College London)

Lars Harrie (Lund University)

J.E. Stoter (TU Delft - Urban Data Science)

Research Group
Urban Data Science
Copyright
© 2019 F. Noardo, F. Biljecki, G. Agugiaro, G.A.K. Arroyo Ohori, Claire Ellul, Lars Harrie, J.E. Stoter
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 F. Noardo, F. Biljecki, G. Agugiaro, G.A.K. Arroyo Ohori, Claire Ellul, Lars Harrie, J.E. Stoter
Research Group
Urban Data Science
Issue number
4/W15
Volume number
XLII
Pages (from-to)
47-52
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

An investigation into the implementation state of open standards in software is currently ongoing through the ISPRS/EuroSDR ‘GeoBIM benchmark 2019’ initiative, which kicked off earlier this year. The benchmark activity provides a way of assessing and comparing the functionality of different software packages in GIS and BIM in terms of their ability to handle standardised data (IFC and CityGML) and undertake various tasks using this data. Approximately 65 people have registered to participate so far, with participants from a wide range of backgrounds and proposing to test a variety of software packages. This confirms that the issues under investigation are of interest, and also meets the wider benchmark aim of having a variety of participants, since the project is conceived as using a bottom-up approach with cross-disciplinary and cross-expertise participation. While full benchmark results are not due to be submitted until later this year, interim results have highlighted a number of common issues across multiple software packages, and a web meeting for participants held in July 2019 also led to some improvements in how the benchmark results are being captured.