What do they know? Investigating students’ ability to analyse experimental data in secondary physics education

Journal Article (2021)
Authors

Freek Pols (TU Delft - ImPhys/Practicum support, Science Education and Communication)

P.J.J.M. Dekkers (Science Education and Communication)

Marc J. de Vries (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology, Science Education and Communication)

Research Group
ImPhys/Practicum support
Copyright
© 2021 C.F.J. Pols, P.J.J.M. Dekkers, M.J. de Vries
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865588
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 C.F.J. Pols, P.J.J.M. Dekkers, M.J. de Vries
Research Group
ImPhys/Practicum support
Issue number
2
Volume number
43
Pages (from-to)
274-297
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865588
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper explores students’ ability to analyse and interpret empirical data as inadequate data analysis skills and understandings may contribute to the renowned disappointing outcomes of practical work in secondary school physics. Selected competences, derived from a collection of leading curricula, are explored through interviews and practical tasks, each consisting of three probes. The 51 students, aged 15 and commencing post-compulsory science education in the Netherlands, were able to carry out basic skills such as collecting data and representing these. In interpreting the data in terms of the investigated phenomenon or situation however, performance was weak. Students often appeared to be unable to identify the crucial features of a given graph. Conclusions based on the data were often tautological or superficial, lacking salient features. Students failed to infer implications from the data, to interpret data at a higher level of abstraction, or to specify limitations to the validity of the analysis or conclusions. The findings imply that the students’ understanding of data-analysis should be developed further before they can engage successfully in more ‘open’ practical work. The study offers a collection of activities that may help to address the situation, suggesting a baseline for guided development of data analysis abilities.