Exploring Equity of Climate Policies using Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
Palok Biswas (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Zuzanna Osika (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Isidoro Tamassia (Student TU Delft)
Adit Whorra (Student TU Delft)
Jazmin Zatarain-Salazar (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Jan Kwakkel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Frans A. Oliehoek (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Pradeep K. Murukannaiah (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Addressing climate change requires coordinated policy efforts of nations worldwide. These efforts are informed by scientific reports, which rely in part on Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), prominent tools used to assess the economic impacts of climate policies. However, traditional IAMs optimize policies based on a single objective, limiting their ability to capture the trade-offs among economic growth, temperature goals, and climate justice. As a result, policy recommendations have been criticized for perpetuating inequalities, fueling disagreements during policy negotiations. We introduce JUSTICE, the first framework integrating IAM with Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MOMARL). By incorporating multiple objectives, JUSTICE generates policy recommendations that shed light on equity while balancing climate and economic goals. Further, using multiple agents can provide a realistic representation of the interactions among the diverse policy actors. We identify equitable Pareto-optimal policies using our framework, which facilitates deliberative decision-making by presenting policymakers with the inherent trade-offs in climate and economic policy.