Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants and Eligibility Criteria for Genetic Testing in Patients Who Visit a Memory Clinic

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Sven J. Van Der Lee (Amsterdam UMC, TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Marc Hulsman (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam UMC)

Rosalina Van Spaendonk (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Jetske Van Der Schaar (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Janna Dijkstra (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Niccoló Tesi (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Marcel Reinders (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Itziar De Rojas (Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, National Institute of Health Carlos III, TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Henne Holstege (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210273 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Journal title
Neurology
Issue number
4
Volume number
104
Article number
e210273
Downloads counter
517
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesIdentifying genetic causes of dementia in patients visiting memory clinics is important for patient care and family planning. Traditional clinical selection criteria for genetic testing may miss carriers of pathogenic variants in dementia-related genes. This study aimed identify how many carriers we are missing and to optimize criteria for selecting patients for genetic counseling in memory clinics.MethodsIn this clinical cohort study, we retrospectively genetically tested patients during 2.5 years (2010-2012) visiting the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, a specialized memory clinic. Genetic tests consisted of a 54-gene dementia panel, focusing on Class IV/V variants per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, including APP duplications and the C9ORF72 repeat expansion. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic variants and propose new eligibility criteria for genetic testing in memory clinics. The eligibility criteria were prospectively applied for 1 year (2021-2022), and results were compared with the retrospective cohort.ResultsGenetic tests were retrospectively performed in in 1,022 of 1,138 patients (90%) who consecutively visited the memory clinic. Among these, 1,022 patients analyzed (mean age 62.1 ± 8.9 years; 40.4% were female), 34 pathogenic variant carriers were identified (3.3%), with 24 being symptomatic. Previous clinical criteria would have identified only 15 carriers (44% of all carriers, 65% of symptomatic carriers). The proposed criteria increased identification to 22 carriers (62.5% of all carriers, 91% of symptomatic carriers). In the prospective cohort, 148 (28.7%) of 515 patients were eligible for testing under the new criteria. Of the 90 eligible patients who consented to testing, 13 pathogenic carriers were identified, representing a 73% increase compared with the previous criteria.DiscussionWe found that patients who visit a memory clinic and carry a pathogenic genetic variant are often not eligible for genetic testing. The proposed new criteria improve the identification of patients with a genetic cause for their cognitive complaints. In systems without practical or financial barriers to genetic testing, the new criteria can enhance personalized care. In other countries where the health care systems differs and in other genetic ancestry groups, the performance of the criteria may be different.