Can the use of different interpolation methods lead to improved performance of the HYPE model?

Student report (2022)

Authors

D.D. Dekker Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Contributors

M. Hrachowitz Water Resources - CEG (supervisor 1)
M.A. Schleiss Atmospheric Remote Sensing - CEG (supervisor 2)
R.R.P. van Nooijen Water Resources - CEG (supervisor 2)
Abdulghani Hasan Lund University (supervisor 1)
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright: © 2022 Diewertje Dekker
Interpolation Hydrological modelling HYPE
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

31-01-2022

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Abstract

This additional thesis project is performed as preliminary research for a bigger project that they are going to start at Lund University, to investigate whether the use of a different interpolation methods, to link the precipitation data to the sub-basins centers of the HYPE model, lead to improved model performance. In this report, previously performed research is summarised and the limitations in researching this question with the HYPE model are described. A start is made with investigating this question, by answering the question whether different interpolation methods result in a different discharge when it is assumed that all fallen precipitation ends up as discharge. This is investigated for the PO basin in Italy with 4 interpolation methods: NN, IDW, BIL and OK. The effects of the interpolation methods on the computed discharge time series are analysed with the use of the correlation, RE, NSE and KGE. It is shown that for the PO basin, with a 1000 km2 average sub-basin size and a gridded data set with a resolution of 50 km, the interpolation methods do not produce differences for which you would expect that it could lead to model improvement. However, based on findings from previous research, a next step is proposed, in which we can investigate if we do observe a difference at a different sub-basin scale or data resolution.