Sagittal Craniosynostosis
Comparing Surgical Techniques Using 3D Photogrammetry
Tareq Abdel-Alim (Erasmus MC)
Melissa Kurniawan (Erasmus MC)
Irene M.J. Mathijssen (Erasmus MC)
Marjolein H.G. Dremmen (Erasmus MC)
Clemens Dirven (Erasmus MC)
W. J. Niessen (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - ImPhys/Vos group, ImPhys/Computational Imaging)
Gennady V. Roshchupkin (Erasmus MC)
Marie Lise C. Van Veelen (Erasmus MC)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare three surgical interventions for correction of sagittal synostosis-frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR), extended strip craniotomy (ESC), and spring-Assisted correction (SAC)-based on three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry and operation characteristics. Methods: Patients who were born between 1991 and 2019 and diagnosed with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis who underwent FBR, ESC, or SAC and had at least one postoperative 3D photogrammetry image taken during one of six follow-up appointments until age 6 were considered for this study. Operative characteristics, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and presence of intracranial hypertension were collected. To assess cranial growth, orthogonal cranial slices and 3D photocephalometric measurements were extracted automatically and evaluated from 3D photogrammetry images. Results: A total of 322 postoperative 3D images from 218 patients were included. After correcting for age and sex, no significant differences were observed in 3D photocephalometric measurements. Mean cranial shapes suggested that postoperative growth and shape gradually normalized with higher occipitofrontal head circumference and intracranial volume values compared with normal values, regardless of type of surgery. Flattening of the vertex seems to persist after surgical correction. The authors' cranial 3D mesh processing tool has been made publicly available as a part of this study. Conclusions: The findings suggest that until age 6, there are no significant differences among the FBR, ESC, and SAC in their ability to correct sagittal synostosis with regard to 3D photocephalometric measurements. Therefore, efforts should be made to ensure early diagnosis so that minimally invasive surgery is a viable treatment option. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
help_outline