Performance Comparison of Deep RL Algorithms for Energy Systems Optimal Scheduling

Conference Paper (2022)
Author(s)

Shengren Hou (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Edgar Mauricio Salazar Salazar (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Pedro Vergara Barrios (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Peter Palensky (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Copyright
© 2022 H. Shengren, Edgar Mauricio Salazar, P.P. Vergara Barrios, P. Palensky
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-Europe54678.2022.9960642
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 H. Shengren, Edgar Mauricio Salazar, P.P. Vergara Barrios, P. Palensky
Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Pages (from-to)
1-6
ISBN (print)
978-1-6654-8033-8
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-6654-8032-1
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Taking advantage of their data-driven and model-free features, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms have the potential to deal with the increasing level of uncertainty due to the introduction of renewable-based generation. To deal simultaneously with the energy systems’ operational cost and technical constraints (e.g, generation-demand power balance) DRL algorithms must consider a trade-off when designing the reward function. This trade-off introduces extra hyperparameters that impact the DRL algorithms’ performance and capability of providing feasible solutions. In this paper, a performance comparison of different DRL algorithms, including DDPG, TD3, SAC, and PPO, are presented. We aim to provide a fair comparison of these DRL algorithms for energy systems optimal scheduling problems. Results show DRL algorithms’ capability of providing in real-time good-quality solutions, even in unseen operational scenarios, when compared with a mathematical programming model of the energy system optimal scheduling problem. Nevertheless, in the case of large peak consumption, these algorithms failed to provide feasible solutions, which can impede their practical implementation.

Files

Performance_Comparison_of_Deep... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.45 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 28-05-2023
License info not available