Assessment of power losses and structural response of offshore floating solar platform

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Alba Alcañiz (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Shagun Agarwal (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Philipp Tiwald (Student TU Delft)

Olindo Isabella (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Hesan Ziar (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Oriol Colomés (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137656 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
Journal title
Energy
Volume number
335
Article number
137656
Downloads counter
165
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

As climate change becomes more critical and renewable energy sources expand, land-based photovoltaic (PV) systems face limitations due to competition with agriculture and housing. The sea offers a promising location for offshore floating PV (OFPV) systems. Understanding fluid–structure interactions is crucial for these systems. This work explores how different parameters affect the structural load on the floating platform and related electrical power losses. We develop a multi-physics framework integrating the mechanical model of a large floating structure with the optoelectrical modeling of PV modules. This framework analyzes a hypothetical OFPV platform design with various floater configurations, from a single large floater to multiple small floaters connected with free hinges. The results reveal a trade-off in the number of floaters. Power mismatch loss is lower for platforms with fewer, longer floaters. However, structural loads vary, with high stresses in longer floaters due to the elastic response. Young’s modulus impacts longer floaters where the elastic response dominates, while cross-section fill ratio affects shorter floaters, where the rigid-body response prevails. The floater-beam thickness has the most significant impact across various floater lengths.