Public participation in mission-oriented innovation projects

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

M.J. Wiarda (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

V.C.M. Sobota (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Matthijs J. Janssen (Universiteit Utrecht)

G. van de Kaa (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

E. Yaghmaei (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

N. Doorn (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122538 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Journal title
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Issue number
122538
Volume number
191
Article number
122538
Downloads counter
376
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Mission-oriented innovation policy is currently gaining renewed interest as an approach for addressing societal challenges. One of the promises is that missions can mobilise and align diverse stakeholders around a shared goal. Recent literature underlines the importance of public participation (e.g. municipalities and civil society organisations) in the socioeconomic transformations required for attaining missions. We ask how public participation differs among (non-)mission-oriented innovation projects. Drawing on a database containing Dutch government-funded innovation projects, we investigate whether mission-oriented projects are associated with earlier, more open, and more influential forms of public participation than conventional projects. Although the results suggest that mission-oriented projects indeed correspond with earlier participation of more public actors, we find little evidence that they also coincide with increased diversity and financial influence of public participants. We conclude by discussing how policymakers and intermediaries may engage in strategies to make missions more inclusive.