Sustainability assessment of methanol steam reforming reactors for shipboard coupling with PEM fuel cells

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Giuseppe Andriani (Università degli Studi di Padova)

Bojan Grenko (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Gianmaria Pio (University of Bologna)

Chiara Vianello (Università degli Studi di Padova)

Ernesto Salzano

Wiebren de Jong (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Robert van de Ketterij (Netherlands Defence Academy)

Lindert van Biert (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Paolo Mocellin (Università degli Studi di Padova)

Research Group
Sustainable Drive and Energy System
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157567 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Sustainable Drive and Energy System
Journal title
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume number
277
Article number
157567
Page Views
12
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Onboard methanol steam reforming (MSR) coupled with proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is investigated as a pathway for maritime decarbonization. Joule heating, flue-gas heating, and condensing-steam heating of multitubular fixed-bed MSR reactors are compared using steady-state one-dimensional models and technological, economic, environmental, and safety indicators. Selected configurations achieved weighted-average methanol conversions higher than 99%. Joule heating produced inlet cold spots of 442–445 K, whereas condensing steam maintained nearly uniform temperatures of 477–478 K. Within the investigated candidate set, normalized aggregated sustainability indicators ranged from 0.64 to 0.88 for Joule heating, 0.87–0.96 for flue-gas heating, and 0.997–0.999 for condensing steam. Condensing-steam heating attained the highest aggregate ranking across the examined decision-making perspectives and aggregation procedures. These relative indicators are not absolute sustainability levels, and the ranking remains conditional on the investigated steady-state design space, system boundaries, model assumptions, and economic and emission factors.