The Importance of Overpass Time in Agricultural Applications of Radar

Conference paper (2021)

Authors

S. Khabbazan Water Resources - CEG
P.C. Vermunt Water Resources - CEG
S.C. Steele-Dunne Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning - CEG
Jasmeet Judge University of Florida
Research Group
Water Resources (CEG) (TU Delft)
Copyright: © 2021 S. Khabbazan, P.C. Vermunt, S.C. Steele-Dunne, J. Judge
DOI
help_outline
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553391
Crop monitoring Surface canopy water Sub-daily radar L-band backscatter VWC
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2021

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Department

Water Management

Research Group

Water Resources

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of diurnal variation in internal and surface canopy water on L-band backscatter in the context of the influence of overpass time on agricultural applications. A unique and intensive dataset was collected during a full growing season of corn in Florida, USA in 2018. L-band data was collected by using a fully polarized scatterometer mounted on a crane. In order to measure internal vegetation water distribution and dry biomass, pre-dawn destructive sampling was conducted three times a week for a full growing season. In addition, soil moisture, meteorological, dew, and interception data were measured every 15 minutes for the entire growing season. Results demonstrate that the presence of surface canopy water and diurnal internal water dynamics can each affect the radar backscatter up to 3–4 dB. The surface canopy water also affects the relationship between radar and crop biophysical variables. In corn, the spearman rank correlation between backscatter and biophysical variables is, on average, about 0.2 higher for dry vegetation compared to wet vegetation. The results highlight the possible influence of overpass time on the interpretation of radar data for vegetation monitoring.