Damage assessment of NCF, 2D and 3D Woven Composites under Compression After Multiple-Impact using Acoustic Emission

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

M Saeedifar (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

MN Saleh (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Hassan M. El-Dessouky (Mansoura University, University of Sheffield)

S. Teixeira de Freitas (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Dimitrios Zarouchas (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Copyright
© 2020 M. Saeedifar, M. Saleh, Hassan M. El-Dessouky, S. Teixeira De Freitas, D. Zarouchas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105833
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M. Saeedifar, M. Saleh, Hassan M. El-Dessouky, S. Teixeira De Freitas, D. Zarouchas
Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Volume number
132
Pages (from-to)
105833
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study is devoted to the damage characterization of Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF), 2D plain-woven (2D-PW) and 3D orthogonal plain-woven (ORT-PW) carbon/epoxy laminates, subjected to compression after multiple-impact loading, using Acoustic Emission (AE). The ultrasonic C-scan images showed that the interlaminar damage area induced by the single and 3-impact in ORT-PW architecture is 3 and 2 times smaller than NCF and 2D-PW architectures respectively. The impacted specimens were then subjected to the in-plane compression load. Two indices, one based on the mechanical response and another one based on the AE behavior of the laminates, were proposed to compare the performance of different architectures. These indices showed that the ORT-PW had the best performance among all the architectures. Finally, AE was used to distinguish the different damage mechanisms including: matrix cracking, intra and inter-yarn debonding, defected-fiber breakage, intact-fiber breakage and z-binder fiber breakage in the CAI tests of the architectures.