Toward Integrated Urban Climate Risk Management: Reflections on a Transdisciplinary Knowledge Approach for the Dutch Delta

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Abdi Mehvar (TU Delft - Urban Development Management)

Zac J. Taylor ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, TU Delft - Urban Development Management)

Tom A. Daamen (Stichting Kennis Gebiedsontwikkeling SKG, TU Delft - Urban Development Management)

A Bruggen (TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Ellen Maria Van Bueren (TU Delft - Management in the Built Environment)

Research Group
Urban Development Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2024-0037
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Urban Development Management
Issue number
1
Volume number
4
Pages (from-to)
202-225
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Real estate, infrastructure, and related urban systems are increasingly exposed to the physical impacts of climate change, threatening both their durability and societal stability. Today the understanding of urban climate risks and their management is emerging but incomplete, highlighting the need for collaborative, integrated, and transparent approaches. However, existing collaborative approaches do not often lead to practical and actionable solutions, exposing a gap in expertise on how to co-create truly integrative approaches in a landscape of fragmented knowledge. Method: This article introduces an integrated approach to transdisciplinary knowledge production on urban climate risk management, using the case of the Red&Blue programme (Real Estate Development and Building in Low Urban Environments). This research-intensive knowledge programme in the low-lying Dutch urban delta was co-created by diverse disciplinary researchers and cross-sectoral practitioners, including financial institutions. Here, the authors reflect on three key “how” questions concerning programme co-creation with stakeholders, the organization of the collaboration process, and capacity development for reflection on insights in transdisciplinary cooperation. Results: Preliminary findings over the last two-and-a-half years of the programme highlight key challenges in transdisciplinary cooperation. To address them, the authors stress the need for creating safe and open spaces for stakeholder dialogue, where diverse cooperation strategies help build shared vocabularies, enabling stakeholders to jointly define, identify, and analyze multidimensional climate risk issues and potential adaptation solutions. Conclusion: The integrated approach presented in this article offers a preliminary model and means to build integrated knowledge on climate risk management and related sustainability transitions in the built environment.

Files

License info not available