The importance of open data and software

Is energy research lagging behind?

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Stefan Pfenninger (ETH Zürich)

Joseph DeCarolis (University of North Carolina)

Lion Hirth (Neon Neue Energieökonomik GmbH (Neon))

S. Quoilin (European Commission Joint Research Centre)

Iain Staffell (Imperial College London)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.046
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Volume number
101
Pages (from-to)
211-215

Abstract

Energy policy often builds on insights gained from quantitative energy models and their underlying data. As climate change mitigation and economic concerns drive a sustained transformation of the energy sector, transparent and well-founded analyses are more important than ever. We assert that models and their associated data must be openly available to facilitate higher quality science, greater productivity through less duplicated effort, and a more effective science-policy boundary. There are also valid reasons why data and code are not open: ethical and security concerns, unwanted exposure, additional workload, and institutional or personal inertia. Overall, energy policy research ostensibly lags behind other fields in promoting more open and reproducible science. We take stock of the status quo and propose actionable steps forward for the energy research community to ensure that it can better engage with decision-makers and continues to deliver robust policy advice in a transparent and reproducible way.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.