ShareYourReality

Investigating Haptic Feedback and Agency in Virtual Avatar Co-embodiment

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

Karthikeya Puttur Venkatraj (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI))

Wo Meijer (TU Delft - Knowledge and Intelligence Design)

Monica Perusquía-Hernández (Nara Institute of Science and Technology)

Gijs Huisman (TU Delft - Human Technology Relations)

Abdallah El Ali (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI))

Research Group
Knowledge and Intelligence Design
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642425 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Knowledge and Intelligence Design
Article number
100
ISBN (print)
979-8-4007-0330-0
Event
2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sytems, CHI 2024 (2024-05-11 - 2024-05-16), Hybrid, Honolulu, United States
Downloads counter
215
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Virtual co-embodiment enables two users to share a single avatar in Virtual Reality (VR). During such experiences, the illusion of shared motion control can break during joint-action activities, highlighting the need for position-aware feedback mechanisms. Drawing on the perceptual crossing paradigm, we explore how haptics can enable non-verbal coordination between co-embodied participants. In a within-subjects study (20 participant pairs), we examined the effects of vibrotactile haptic feedback (None, Present) and avatar control distribution (25-75%, 50-50%, 75-25%) across two VR reaching tasks (Targeted, Free-choice) on participants’ Sense of Agency (SoA), co-presence, body ownership, and motion synchrony. We found (a) lower SoA in the free-choice with haptics than without, (b) higher SoA during the shared targeted task, (c) co-presence and body ownership were significantly higher in the free-choice task, (d) players’ hand motions synchronized more in the targeted task. We provide cautionary considerations when including haptic feedback mechanisms for avatar co-embodiment experiences.