Haptic Shared Control during Automated Take-Off

Effects on Trust and Workload

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

A. Jilaau (Cranfield University)

J. Blundell (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering, Cranfield University)

W. Korek (Cranfield University)

D. M. Pool (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

M. M.Van Paassen (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

M. Mulder (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS69701.2026.11602165 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Pages (from-to)
14-19
Publisher
IEEE
ISBN (electronic)
9798331545116
Event
2026 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, ICHMS 2026 (2026-07-01 - 2026-07-03), Singapore, Singapore
Page Views
51
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Automation reduces pilot workload but introduces risks such as mode confusion and automation surprise, which can impair situation awareness and delay responses. Haptic shared control, delivered via active sidesticks, may mitigate these risks by providing continuous force feedback to convey automation intent and warnings. This study examined how the haptic information in shared control systems affects trust, workload, and awareness during automated take-off scenarios involving normal and abnormal autopilot behaviors. Twenty participants monitored automation performance while completing a secondary 2-back task under two shared control conditions: haptic shared versus input-mixing shared control. Results show that abnormal autopilot behaviors significantly increased workload and reduced trust, with haptic shared control having context-dependent effects - supporting trust and reducing workload during over-rotation but lowering trust in normal conditions. Haptic shared control had no significant effect upon participant situation awareness or secondary task performance. These findings suggest that the provision of haptic information within shared control can support pilots during automation anomalies but require human-centered implementation and training to avoid unintended effects under normal conditions.

Files

– Personal use only – Dutch Copyright Act (Article 25fa)
warning

File under embargo until 18-01-2027