Combustion mode analysis of a large-bore methanol premixed dual-fuel engine with high methanol energy fractions

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Konstantinos I. Kiouranakis (TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations)

Robbert Willems (TNO)

Peter de Vos (TU Delft - Sustainable Drive and Energy System)

Rinze Geertsma (TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations, Netherlands Defence Academy)

Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101417
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
Volume number
29
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Methanol has emerged as a promising sustainable fuel for shipping, with the premixed dual-fuel (PRDF) strategy holding strong potential for deploying it in marine internal combustion engines. However, achieving high methanol energy fractions (MEFs) remains challenging due to combustion stability issues, which limit efficiency and operating robustness. Experimental insights into high-MEF operation are scarce, particularly for large-bore engines, leaving critical knowledge gaps in understanding combustion and performance characteristics of methanol PRDF engines. This study addresses these gaps through an experimental investigation on a marine-scale single-cylinder engine, operating with up to 93% MEF and high-load conditions. Two distinct MEF operational ranges were identified, with different mechanisms limiting each boundary. Poor combustion performance and elevated unburned hydrocarbon emissions emerged as the primary factors limiting high MEFs and were more sensitive to pilot ignition timing than to ignition energy. Although energy from premixed combustion Phase I decreased from 25% at 79% MEF to 6.2% at 93% MEF at maximum load, advancing ignition by a shortened ignition delay (from 9.2 °CA to 4.4 °CA) improved combustion efficiency (from 87.9% to 92.7%) and gross indicated thermal efficiency (from 43.4% to 45.3%). A novel framework was applied to analyze heat release profiles, combining qualitative assessment with a quantitative methodology based on two morphology metrics. This approach revealed three distinct combustion modes—characterized by m-, h-, and n-shaped profiles—unique to methanol PRDF operation, each linked to specific underlying mechanisms, and provides a systematic tool for combustion mode classification.