Context or composition

How does neighbourhood deprivation impact upon adolescent smoking behaviour?

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

T. Morris (University of Bristol)

David Manley (TU Delft - OLD Urban Renewal and Housing, University of Bristol)

Maarten van van Ham (University of St Andrews, TU Delft - OLD Urban Renewal and Housing)

Research Group
OLD Urban Renewal and Housing
Copyright
© 2018 T. Morris, D.J. Manley, M. van Ham
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192566
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 T. Morris, D.J. Manley, M. van Ham
Research Group
OLD Urban Renewal and Housing
Issue number
2
Volume number
13
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Neighbourhood effects studies have demonstrated an association between area deprivation and smoking behaviour whereby people living in deprived neighbourhoods are more likely to smoke than those in non-deprived neighbourhoods. This evidence though is based largely upon data that ignores long term exposures to neighbourhood contexts and is confounded by neighbourhood selection bias. In this study, we investigate the temporal ordering of exposure to neighbourhood deprivation throughout childhood and whether associations between neighbourhood deprivation and cigarette smoking are due to compositional or contextual neighbourhood effects. Data come from a UK cohort study, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). We use longitudinal measures of neighbourhood deprivation and self-reported smoking behaviour for 2744 children to examine the influence of neighbourhood deprivation on smoking status and smoking heaviness at age 17. Our results demonstrate that children who are born into and grow up in deprived neighbourhoods are up to twice as likely to be smokers at age 17 than those in non-deprived neighbourhoods. These associations are largely due to family socioeconomic position and the intergenerational transmission of smoking behaviour from parents to children; compositional rather than direct contextual ‘neighbourhood effects’. Our findings highlight the importance of considering longitudinal exposure to neighbourhood deprivation over cross sectional exposure. In conclusion, we find that it is the family rather than the neighbourhood into which a child is born that determines their smoking behaviour.