A probabilistic approach to estimating residential losses from different flood types

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Dominik Paprotny (GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung)

Heidi Kreibich (GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung)

Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Dennis Wagenaar (Deltares)

Attilio Castellarin (University of Bologna)

Francesca Carisi (University of Bologna)

Xavier Bertin (Universite de la Rochelle-CNRS)

Bruno Merz (Institute of Physics and Astronomy, GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung)

Kai Schröter (GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04413-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Journal title
Natural Hazards
Issue number
3
Volume number
105
Pages (from-to)
2569-2601
Downloads counter
418
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Residential assets, comprising buildings and household contents, are a major source of direct flood losses. Existing damage models are mostly deterministic and limited to particular countries or flood types. Here, we compile building-level losses from Germany, Italy and the Netherlands covering a wide range of fluvial and pluvial flood events. Utilizing a Bayesian network (BN) for continuous variables, we find that relative losses (i.e. loss relative to exposure) to building structure and its contents could be estimated with five variables: water depth, flow velocity, event return period, building usable floor space area and regional disposable income per capita. The model’s ability to predict flood losses is validated for the 11 flood events contained in the sample. Predictions for the German and Italian fluvial floods were better than for pluvial floods or the 1993 Meuse river flood. Further, a case study of a 2010 coastal flood in France is used to test the BN model’s performance for a type of flood not included in the survey dataset. Overall, the BN model achieved better results than any of 10 alternative damage models for reproducing average losses for the 2010 flood. An additional case study of a 2013 fluvial flood has also shown good performance of the model. The study shows that data from many flood events can be combined to derive most important factors driving flood losses across regions and time, and that resulting damage models could be applied in an open data framework.