Gremlins in the Silicon
Why Faulty Chips are Escaping the Fab and Crashing in the Field
Mottaqiallah Taouil (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Shawn Blanton (Carnegie Mellon University)
Phil Nigh (Auburn University)
Adit D. Singh (Auburn University)
Said Hamdioui (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The increasing complexity of semiconductor technologies is exposing limitations in traditional manufacturing test methodologies. Although fault-model-based testing has enabled efficient production screening for decades, growing evidence from advanced logic and memory technologies indicates that many realistic defect mechanisms are insufficiently represented by conventional fault abstractions, leading to test escapes and in-field failures. This paper examines three directions for improving outgoing product quality. First, we discuss the growing mismatch between fault models and actual silicon behavior and emphasize the need for silicon-informed assessment of defect coverage. Second, we investigate timing failures caused by process-variation-induced delay marginalities, which increasingly evade conventional scan-based delay testing. Finally, we present Device-Aware Test (DAT), a defect-centric methodology that derives fault models and test solutions directly from physical defect behavior. Examples from STT-MRAM, RRAM, and FeFET memories demonstrate how DAT enables the detection of realistic defect mechanisms beyond the reach of conventional approaches. Together, these directions support a transition toward defect-aware, data-driven testing for future semiconductor systems.
Files
File under embargo until 11-01-2027