Expert judgment in life-cycle degradation and maintenance modelling for steel bridges

Conference Paper (2016)
Author(s)

A Kosgodagan (École des Mines de Nantes, TNO)

Oswaldo Morales Napoles (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

J Maljaars (Eindhoven University of Technology)

W Courage (TNO)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375175-313 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Pages (from-to)
2130–2137
ISBN (print)
978-1-138-02847-0
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-4987-7701-8
Event
5th International Symposium on Life-Cycle Engineering (2016-10-16 - 2016-10-20), Delft, Netherlands
Downloads counter
309
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Markov-based models for predicting deterioration for civil infrastructures are widely recognized as suitable tools addressing this mechanism. The objective of this paper is to provide insights regarding a network of orthotropic steel bridges in terms of degradation. Consequently, a model combining a dynamic Bayesian network and a Markov chain is first introduced that builds up the network in a concise way. In an attempt to represent a network composed of two general classes of orthotropic steel bridges, the classical method of structured expert judgment is carried out as a quantification procedure. The first objective is to indirectly elicit transition probabilities for a Markov chain that probabilistically describes how each type bridge temporally deteriorates. Second, experts are asked to provide estimates on required conditional probabilities related to the Bayesian network. An in-depth analysis of the results is presented so that remarks and observations are subsequently pointed out and, finally conclusions are drawn.

Files

License info not available