Comparative enviro-economic impact assessment of Dutch chlorine production systems: Investigating different methods for monetizing environmental externalities
Orestis Diafonidis (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
Gijsbert Korevaar – Mentor (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)
Cees van Beers – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)
Enno Schröder – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)
George Tsalidis – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
To fend off the probable adverse effects of climate change as well as the subsequent economic and social impacts as a consequence of humans’ industrial activities, drastic changes are required in the way of processing, managing and exploiting natural resources. Based on a case study, the present report combines life-cycle assessment and life-cycle costing techniques on the basis of environmental externalities monetization with a view to conducting a multi-perspective comparative assessment of different chlorine manufacturing systems so that to identify which alternative can lead to the lowest environmental footprint and cost-intensity. Our findings suggest that the most cost-effective and less environmentally-intensive technical solution concerns the modification of the electrolysis cell’s configuration type from gap to zero-gap one when the heat is supplied by an on-site CHP facility. This modification is accompanied by 39% reduction of CO2 emissions in the membrane electrolysis stage and 24% reduction in the total CO2 emissions per ton of chlorine produced. Moreover, annual savings and profits increase while chain-related environmental costs substantially decline.