Linear Reinforcement Learning for Energy Storage Systems Optimal Dispatch

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

Shuyi Gao (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Shengren Hou (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Edgar Mauricio Salazar Salazar (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Peter Palensky (TU Delft - Electrical Sustainable Energy)

Pedro Vergara Barrios (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863043
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
ISBN (electronic)
9789531842976
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising solution for defining the optimal dispatch of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) in distributed energy systems. However, a notable gap exists in the literature: a lack of comprehensive and fair comparisons between different RL algorithms, particularly between linear and nonlinear approaches. This study critically evaluates the trade-offs between computational efficiency and operational accuracy among various Linear RL (LRL) strategies and compares them against the nonlinear Deep-Q-Network (DQN) algorithm. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study benchmarks the model-based Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) results to assess and compare these algorithms' convergence, training efficiency, and optimization accuracy. Results indicate that while LRL approaches the operational cost accuracy of DQN, it faces significant trade-offs in computational efficiency and struggles with generalization across larger and varied datasets. The results illuminate critical areas for further development in LRL methodologies, particularly in enhancing their adaptability and generalization capabilities.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 15-09-2025