Automatic Running Event Visualization using Video from Multiple Camera

Master Thesis (2019)
Author(s)

Priadi Priadi Teguh Wibowo (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

J.C. Gemert – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

MJT Reinders – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

A. Vilanova – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Computer Graphics and Visualisation)

Y. Napolean – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2019 Priadi Priadi Teguh Wibowo
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Priadi Priadi Teguh Wibowo
Graduation Date
27-06-2019
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Electrical Engineering | Embedded Systems']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Visualizing runners trajectory from video data is not straightforward because the video data does not contain the explicit information of which runners appear in the video. Only the visual information related to the runner, such as runner’s unique ID (called bib number), is available. To this end, we propose two automatic runner detection methods, i.e. scene text detection which identifies the runners by detecting their bib number and person re-identification which detects the runners based on their appearance. To evaluate the proposed methods, we create a ground truth database from the video dataset, which consists of video and frame interval information where the runners appear. The video dataset was recorded by nine cameras at different locations during the Campus Run 2018 event. The experimental evidence shows that the scene text recognition method achieves up to 74.05 for F1-score and person re identification achieves up to 87.76 for F1-score. To conclude, we find that the person re-identification method outperforms the scene text recognition method.

Files

Priadi_thesis_report.pdf
(pdf | 9.99 Mb)
License info not available