Climate-induced conflict? The role of meteorological drought indicators for communal conflict prediction in North-Western Kenya

Master Thesis (2023)
Author(s)

C.S. Gasten (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

Remko Uijlenhoet – Mentor (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Saket Pande – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Water Resources)

V.J. Cortes Arevalo – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

F. Sperna Weiland – Graduation committee member (Deltares)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2023 Caroline Gasten
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Caroline Gasten
Coordinates
2.73,35.95
Graduation Date
29-08-2023
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Civil Engineering
Sponsors
Deltares
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Recent Conflict Early Warning Systems have found little evidence of predictive power of drought indicators for conflict prediction. However, this may result from the context-specificity of the drought-conflict relationship, as stressed in the more recent climate-conflict literature.

The present thesis assesses the local role of meteorological drought indicators for communal conflict prediction in North-Western Kenya, as a region where the narrative of resource-scarcity driven conflicts exists.

A local-scale literature review on conflict dynamics followed by a fixed-effects logistic regression modelling approach stress the importance of the spatial dimension when analysing drought-conflict relationships. The role of cross-border transhumance in linking climate variability to conflict occurrence is stressed by the lower confidence intervals and more significant effects when moving the regression analysis from the spatial delimitation of administrative units to the agency level of ethnic groups.

Differences in between ethnic groups in the obtained patterns of conflict behaviour in response to drought or water abundance are explained by their migratory behaviour along with a differentiated account of their relative drought vulnerability.

The lack of any considerable role of drought in the subsequently built quasi-replication of the WPS Global Early Warning Tool, is therefore assigned to the mismatch of administrative units as the spatial
unit of analysis in a pastoralist area, where herders frequently move their cattle to the other side of the border.

It is advocated for an ethnic-group centered approach to predicting conflict, which relaxes assumptions on spatial containment of conflict events. However, whether this alternative model specification leads
to a greater role of drought indicators in conflict prediction and better overall predictions, needs to be assessed in future work.

Files

License info not available