Optimizing offshore wind farm transportation and installation strategies including manufacturing ports
Using a rolling horizon simulation model
T.P. Frijlink (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Lóránt A. Tavasszy – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)
MB Duinkerken – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)
Stefano Fazi – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The installation rate of offshore wind energy has to be quadrupled by 2030 to meet the green climate ambitions of European countries, but this growth is hindered by logistical challenges. Therefore, this study explores how two transportation and installation strategies, shuttling and feedering, affect the installation rate with the inclusion of manufacturing ports. Shuttling is where the installation vessel collects components itself at a port, and feedering is where the installation vessel remains offshore and gets supplied directly via feeder vessels. This is a novel approach as feedering and manufacturing ports are often not considered and production rates at manufacturing ports have not been considered at all. A rolling horizon simulation model is developed, which uses a Markov simulation model for weather forecasting, with a 72.92% forecast accuracy over two weeks, and a greedy algorithm for transportation and installation optimization. Results indicate that accurate initial buffer calculations, depending on the production rate at the manufacturing ports and project-dependent characteristics, can increase the installation rate significantly for either strategy. Shuttling becomes more efficient than feedering if the distance between the manufacturing ports and the offshore wind farm is too large or the size of the feeder vessels is too small. Feedering is more efficient in all other circumstances and, on average, results in a 9.2% higher installation rate and reduces project duration by 29 days compared to shuttling.